Reposted from Holy Week 2010.
Is it any wonder that since the beginning of the Jesus movement Christians have been suspected of doing strange things when they gather for their sacred rituals?
Cannibalism was the charge leveled against the earliest Christians: “What do you mean you eat the body and blood of your Lord?” incredulous civil authorities demanded of those first underground believers. Their understandable horror is
lost on us.
This ”fellowship meal” that Christians continue to share (sounds so benign, doesn’t it?) is rooted in denial, betrayal, a disciple’s suicide, a Messiah’s death, the body and blood of this crucified Messiah, and . . . dirty feet.
Jesus gave the mandatum (from which we derive “Maundy”)–”to wash one another’s feet”–after he showed his disciples how to do it. This act of humility, he said, is not peripheral but integral to life in the reign of God. It is servant leadership learned in the doing of it.
With his enthusiasm characteristically misplaced, Peter wants the full-service wash: “my hands and head also, please!” But Peter’s foolishness provides the opportunity for Jesus to prefigure another friend’s imminent betrayal: “you are clean, though not all of you.”
Peter’s ignorant exuberance. The silent treachery of Judas. This fugitive community gathered for the last meal of a soon-to-be-condemned state criminal. Strange beginnings for a strange community, indeed.
In the midst of misunderstanding and a friend’s double-cross, Jesus sinks down to the lowliest of places to reveal not only the nature of servant leadership in the Kingdom but the very meaning of his death. Into the chaos and confusion of human existence the God of heaven stoops to dwell; into deceit and double-dealing, into the misery, fraud, and loneliness of our small lives–into this and more the Word became incarnate, and lived among us “full of grace and truth.” And the life he lived led to the death he died.
In a video segment of the popular Bible study, Jesus in the Gospels, South African theologian and Methodist bishop Peter Storey notes how fond Christians are of saying–especially during Holy Week perhaps–that “God sent Jesus to die on the cross.” But that way of putting it, says Storey, robs Jesus of his humanity, his capacity for moral choice; Jesus, on this view, is little more than a programmed robot, marching passively to a preordained fate.
God sent Jesus into the world not to die, Storey reminds us, but to love. And to those who tried to fence his love in, whose empty legalism was exposed, whose very social order was threatened–to those it became clear that to stop his loving they would have to destroy him. And so they did.
But on the night before he died, Jesus spent his love–his profligate, prodigal love–in an act of domestic servitude, washing the feet of his mystifed family of followers. This act of love was wasted on a dunce like Peter and a scoundrel like Judas and from this we know that it is wasted, even now, on cons and failures like us.
March 30, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Wonderful way of explaining
March 31, 2010 at 10:34 am
Your last paragraph says it all!!! Thanks for your great commentary.
March 31, 2010 at 11:42 am
…Awesome article, Debra. I intend to quote and to credit you tomorrow evening with a thankful heart for your inspired insights…
Have a blessed Triduum, +DM
March 31, 2010 at 2:07 pm
Sue, Bill, and Drex: Thanks to each of you.
March 31, 2010 at 3:43 pm
I should have read this before class today. Better late than never.
April 1, 2010 at 8:37 am
Great post. Thank you. I am going to link to it on my blog.
April 3, 2010 at 8:03 pm
You quote Miroslav Volf puts it, “Jesus is not a third party inserted between God and humanity to take care of human sin. He is the God who was wronged . . . God placed human sin upon God.”
Which book and what page?
Thanks!
April 9, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Thank you for your thoughts. Beautifully put!
I’m intrigued by the last bit where you point out that if God sent Jesus to die, it robs him of his humanity in some way. I suspect that possibly it robs him of his divinity as well, to make him God’s puppet, instead of God come in the flesh to dwell among us. How true though, that when we begin to see the gospel accounts through the lens of his love, instead of the lens of his death, so much more comes into focus. If his life as portrayed in the gospels is only about his death, then it’s possibly unclear what the foot-washing is even about.
I suspect I’ll be thinking on your words for awhile. Thank you again.
April 26, 2010 at 8:29 am
Thank you for your perspective…..
April 21, 2011 at 11:24 pm
I come upon this late at night…after my own bobbling mandatum…The compassion is sorely needed, patiently felt, and profoundly appreciated. I’m always haunted this time of year by the lines of a Will Campbell song (Will D. Campbell, Baptist of the South), although he attributed them to some unnamed cousin, he didn’t know he had, from Slidell, LA, something like, “God, it’s already Good Friday/ and I can’t even spell salvation right./ Here it is, almost Easter morning/ but for fools like me, it’s still Thursday night…
January 28, 2012 at 11:30 am
Debra — Thank you for sharing, As I contemplate preaching this year on Maundy Thursday I am referencing your blog — keep up the good work!
Duane — I am curious of the song you mention — I am a fan of Campbell but have never heard of it — can anyone give me more info. brosimmons@gmail.com
April 5, 2012 at 11:57 am
[...] is and diagrams a range of options. John Shuck reviewed Robert Price’s book on mythicism.Debra Murphy suggests that Maundy Thursday is for April Fools. Mike Friesen suggests that Southpark can teach Christians something important about Easter.Also [...]
April 14, 2012 at 8:24 am
xlent post. many don’t realize to that much of the anguish of the cross was the humiliation and shame associated with crucifixion. Jesus’ death on the cross was mercifully over rather quickly; I have heard that some have survived for up to 3 days before dying such an awful death.