I’ve never liked the phrase “Jesus is the reason for the season.”
It’s fine with me when people write “Xmas”
instead of “Christmas.”
I think the “war on Christmas” (as I wrote last week) is falsely-hyped nonsense.
Pardon my grouchiness this close to the big day, but when earnest, well-meaning Christians say we need to “keep Christ in Christmas,” it’s hard to resist saying things like:
1. It’s not about the baby. Even before he was born, Jesus’ mother knew a thing or two about what his life (and death) would mean. It had little to do with cradles and creches and Christmas angels, and everything to do with raw power and the vulnerable poor: “He has brought down the powerful from their thrones, and lifted up the lowly. He has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the rich away empty.” The Christ of Christmas turns everything upside down and knocks everything sideways (like tables in the Temple and our own safe, soft, sentimental faith).
2. It’s not about family values. Create and savor all the family holiday traditions you want — the eating and drinking, the fun and games — it’s all good. But don’t confuse family togetherness (which is usually more imagined than actual) with the good news of the Incarnation: “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law, and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household.” The Christ of Christmas hardly endorses the agenda of Focus on the Family. In the Church, baptism trumps biology, and thank God for that.
3. It’s not even about Christmas. Easter is the Church’s primary feast day, the festival on which hangs “the hopes and fears of all the years.” The feast of the nativity was a minor observance in the Christian year until the mid-nineteenth century when commercial interests figured out how to exploit it solely for profit. (Clement Moore’s popular poem also contributed to the American mythology of Christmas: St. Nicholas morphed into Santa, and reindeer, stockings, and sugar plums entered the story). The Christ mass, by contrast, is “the feast of Nicene dogma” and the Christ of Christmas is the second person of the Trinity, the Logos of God made flesh.
For all the preachiness of my three points, I hope there is also a grace-filled word of encouragement in their essentials: The Jesus who comes into the world naked, homeless, and vulnerable is the Christ who comes to each of us in our own godforsakenness. And we know this not because of the cradle but because of the cross. The journey to Bethlehem, the risky birth in a barn, the flight to Egypt — these are not mere Christmas-pageant moments in a perpetually-adolescent faith; rather they are reminders of the historical dangers, the sheer contingency on which a mature, disciplined faith must rest: into a world of violence, fear, and misery, God came.
And into our own violent, fearful, miserable lives, God continues to come.
December 23, 2010 at 11:45 am
Debra: Thanks again for a thought-provoking and balanced commentary on this Holy Season that has suddenly appeared (too soon for me) once again… I’ve missed reading your work, as I’m moving/settling into a new parish. May the Presence of the Coming One continue to illuminate your heart, mind ad spirit…+DM
December 23, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Amen,
I am frustrated by culture war language. If the church just lived like the church, preached its message, and practiced its liturgies…that would be a revolution! It needs to practice peace and love not just pontificate about it, and the sacredness of the word “Christmas.” Doing so is not enough!
And oh yeah, not to be grouchy either, but i am tired of hearing folks say that Christmas is about family and tradition. Ballcocks! Christmas is apocalyptic – Christ brought the Kingdom…it can even be called “counter-cultural.” Christmas should give meaning to family and tradition, but not the other way around.
December 23, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Thanks, Drex – didn’t realized you had moved; hope you have a peaceful Christmastide.
Jarrod – I feel your frustration! Christmas blessings (and safe travels) to you.
December 24, 2010 at 12:30 am
Thanks be to God!
December 24, 2010 at 9:30 am
Yes! Succinct and so true. I have decided to preach about Santa and not Jesus tomorrow, that way I might hold their attention for 30 seconds longer. Blessed Christ Mass, see you at Easter under the real blessing tree.
December 24, 2010 at 11:01 pm
[...] Jesus! Enough Already with “Keeping Christ in Christmas” « Intersections: Thoughts on Religion,…. [...]
December 25, 2010 at 12:03 am
That Fox in the Temple post was me. I really resonated with your post, Debra. Well done & thanks!
December 25, 2010 at 12:48 am
Thanks, Joey. I’d be interested, Peter, to know how that sermon went.
Mick, I’m happy to know about your blog. Merry Christmas, everyone.
December 28, 2010 at 11:01 am
thanks ever so much. i certainly doubt it, but it would be a blessing to send so called santa claus, easter bunny and teeth fairies back to the pit of hell where they came from. it is also too bad that one of our two main “national high and holy days called holloween” comes before “All Saints Day” which is totally forgotten. We must give thanks that Jesus is alive, well and in charge.
January 3, 2011 at 3:15 pm
This time of year, I become acutely aware of how much I miss you. I must admit I did allow myself to get carried away with the commercialism of Christmas this year. A little dose of Debra Dean Murphy is just what I needed to come out of my Christmas “hangover.” As always, I am profoundly grateful for your gift of words and ability to cut through the rubbish!
January 7, 2011 at 12:20 am
Thanks, Kristal – good to hear from you.
November 6, 2012 at 12:17 am
Wondering now what Jesus thinks of all our parties, church and family traditions, Kris Kringle, caroling, cantatas…
November 6, 2012 at 8:55 pm
Wow! What a gift to once again read this post and the responses almost two years later!
December 23, 2012 at 8:39 pm
thank you!